Noninvasive Hemoglobin Monitoring for Postoperative Pediatric Orthopaedic Patients: A Preliminary Study.

BACKGROUND: Hemoglobin (Hgb) levels are frequently checked through venipuncture [invasive hemoglobin (iHgb)] in pediatric orthopaedic patients after high blood loss procedures. This needlestick may causes further anxiety and fear in hospitalized children. Noninvasive hemoglobin (nHgb) monitoring has been effectively utilized in the adult intensive care and postoperative total joint arthroplasty setting. nHgb monitoring has not yet been validated in children for routine postoperative Hgb assessment in pediatric orthopaedics. METHODS: In this prospective study, 46 pediatric orthopaedic patients were enrolled who were undergoing surgery and postoperative standard of care iHgb testing. On postoperative day 1, Hgb levels were obtained through venipuncture and nHgb monitor (Pronto-7; Masimo) within a 2-hour period. Patient preferences, iHgb and nHgb values, time to result, and provider preferences were recorded. Cost data were estimated based on the standard Medicare payment rates for lab services versus the cost of nHgb probe. RESULTS: nHgb results were obtained after 1 attempt in 38 patients (83%), after multiple attempts in 7 patients (15%), and could not be obtained in 1 patient. The mean time to obtain nHgb value was significantly shorter than that to obtain iHgb results (1.3±1.5 vs. 40±18.1 min; P <0.0001). The mean nHgb value was significantly higher than the mean iHgb value (11.7±1.5 vs. 10.6±1.1 g/dL, P <0.0001). nHgb exceeded iHgb by 2 g/dL or more in 12 (26%) patients (2.64±0.9 vs. 0.54±0.84 g/dL; P <0.0001). The concordance correlation coefficient between the 2 Hgb methods was 0.59, indicating moderate agreement. Forty-three (93%) of our patients and 34 (74%) of the care providers preferred nHgb over iHgb if results were equivalent. At our institution, the cost per iHgb monitoring is approximately $28 per blood draw as compared with $5 for nHgb monitoring. Interestingly, no patients required postoperative transfusion during the study period, as asymptomatic patients with no cardiac disease are typically observed unless the Hgb is <6. CONCLUSIONS: nHgb monitoring in postoperative pediatric patients overestimated Hgb levels compared with the standard of care methods; however, nHgb had high patient and provider satisfaction and had moderate agreement with iHgb. As no patients required transfusion, postoperative Hgb checks could likely be discontinued in some portion of our population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level Ib-Diagnostic study.

Targeted ordering of investigations reduces costs of treatment for surgical inpatients.

BACKGROUND: Laboratory testing forms an important part of diagnostic investigation in modern medicine; however, the overuse of 'routine blood tests' can result in significant potential harm and financial cost to the patient and the healthcare system. In 2018, a new protocol targeting the ordering of investigations was implemented within the General Surgical Teams of Wollongong Hospital in New South Wales, an Australian tertiary referral hospital, to reduce the number of 'routine blood tests' as a quality improvement initiative. OBJECTIVE: To identify whether there was a reduction in the number of 'routine blood tests' and associated costs following implementation of the new protocol. METHODS: The protocol involved regular review of the laboratory investigations being ordered for the following day with a senior team member. The medical records of all patients admitted under the general surgery service at Wollongong Hospital were retrospectively reviewed over two 10-week periods in 2017 and 2018 (control and study, respectively). The casemix was categorized into Minor, Intermediate, Major or Unscored, depending on case complexity coding. RESULTS: A total of 838 patients were identified during the control period (2017) and 805 patients were identified during the study period (2018). Ten thousand and thirty tests were included in the control period, compared to 8610 over the study period, resulting in a 16% (or greater) reduction in 'routine blood tests' per patient, per day of admission and a 6% reduction in costs in the study group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Targeted ordering of investigations with personalized education and feedback to junior staff during review of clinical status of each patient as a part of normal workflow can reduce inappropriate ordering of 'routine blood tests' and associated costs to the patient and the healthcare system.

Evaluation of simple and cost-effective immuno- haematological markers to predict outcome in hospitalized severe COVID-19 patients, with a focus on diabetes mellitus - A retrospective study in Andhra Pradesh, India.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: COVID-19 pandemic has strained the health infrastructure globally, providing an opportunity to identify cost-effective biomarkers. We aimed to identify simple hematological prognostic markers in hospitalized severe COVID-19 patients with and without diabetes. METHODS: Retrospective study of RT-PCR confirmed hospitalized severe COVID-19 patients (total: n = 154 patients, including diabetic subset n = 57) were analyzed. Clinically applicable cut-offs were derived using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for total leucocyte count (TLC), absolute neutrophil count (ANC), neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and derived neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) in order to prognosticate the outcome. RESULTS: Among 154 severe COVID-19 patients, significant association with mortality was seen with respect to TLC(p < 0.001), ANC (p < 0.001), NLR(p < 0.001) and dNLR(p < 0.001). In the total cohort, applicable cut-offs based on ROC curve in predicting outcome were, for TLC 8950 cells/mm3 (area under curve (AUC)-0.764, odds ratio (OR)-7.53), ANC 7679 cells/mm3 (AUC-0.789, OR-8.14), NLR 5.13 (AUC-0.741, OR-4.77), dNLR 3.44 (AUC -0.741, OR-4.43) respectively.In diabetic subset, the cut-offs for TLC was 8950 cells/mm3 (AUC -0.762, OR-14.9), ANC 6510 cells/mm3 (AUC -0.773, OR-16.8), NLR 5.13(AUC -0.678, OR-6) and dNLR 3.25(AUC -0.685, OR-4.7) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In severe COVID-19 patients irrespective of diabetes, a simple, applicable total leucocyte count cut-off, 8950 cells/mm3 , together with easily derived cut-offs for ANC, NLR, dNLR may serve as cost-effective prognosticators of clinical outcome. A normal TLC may be misleading in the intensive care and the above applicable cut-off for TLC serves as an early warning tool for high-risk identification and better in-hospital management. Even with similar or lower cut-offs, diabetics had a higher mortality.

HCV core antigen plays an important role in the fight against HCV as an alternative to HCV-RNA detection.

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the clinical significance of HCV-cAg testing in the diagnosis, activity determination, and monitoring of therapeutic effectiveness of HCV infection and its advantages compared with HCV-RNA and anti-HCV antibodies detection. METHODS: By summarizing the published literature, the advantages and significance of HCV core antigen detection were sought. RESULTS: The expression of HCV-cAg is highly consistent with that of HCV-RNA, but compared with HCV-RNA, detection of HCV-cAg is easy to operate, time saving, and low cost. HCV-cAg can be detected within 12~15 days after infection, and the window period can be shortened by5~7 weeks. HCV-cAg is a serological indicator of virus replication, which can distinguish previous infection of HCV or current infection. HCV-cAg detection is more suitable for immunocompromised, hemodialysis, organ transplant patients. HCV-cAg also can be used to monitor antiviral efficacy and predict sustained virological response (SVR). CONCLUSION: HCV core antigen has similar clinical sensitivity to NAT and can be used as a substitute for HCV-RNA in the diagnosis of virus infection. Combined detection of HCV-cAg and antibody serology can help doctors detect HCV infection earlier, accurately diagnose different stages of HCV infection, and evaluate the therapeutic effect of antiviral drugs, which are beneficial in the prevention and treatment of hepatitis C.

Hepatitis C virus core antigen as alternative diagnostic algorithm for active hepatitis C virus infection among haemodialysis population: Cost implications.

AIMS: In Malaysia, majority anti-HCV positive haemodialysis patients do not undergo hepatitis C confirmation due to the high cost of HCV RNA. HCV Core Antigen might be a cost-effective diagnostic test to identify HD patients who have active HCV infection eligible for Direct Acting Anti-viral therapy. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the correlation between HCV Ag and HCV RNA and the cost implications of different diagnostic algorithms to diagnose active HCV infection using Anti-HCV, HCV Ag, and HCV RNA. Pre-dialysis blood was tested for both HCV Ag and HCV RNA. HCV Ag was tested with Abbott ARCHITECT HCV Ag test. RESULTS: Two-hundred twenty-seven haemodialysis patients were recruited from 20 centres with mean age of 57.68 ± 12.48 years, and male constitutes 56.8% (129) of the study population. HCV Ag correlated well with HCV RNA (Spearman test coefficient 0.943, p < .001) with sensitivity of 93.9%, specificity 99.3%, and the accuracy was 97.36%. Cost analysis indicated that a sequential test involving Anti-HCV antibody as initial screening, followed by HCV Ag on Anti-HCV positive and HCV RNA on HCV Ag negative cases translated to a modest cost-saving algorithm compared to standard diagnostic algorithm. CONCLUSION: HCV Ag correlated well with HCV RNA and can potentially be fused in an alternative diagnostic algorithm to generate cost savings methods to diagnose active HCV infection among haemodialysis patients. This alternative algorithm is especially relevant in low to middle-income countries such as Malaysia to optimize the use of the healthcare resource and gains in clinical outcomes.

Prognostic value of labs ordered on patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

Background: Hospitalists at our institution have taken on most non-intensive care unit (ICU) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) care. Based on sparse research, our institution developed a protocol for ordering labs for this patient population, including routine admission labs in addition to eight COVID-19-specific daily labs. The study goal is to determine if COVID-19-specific admission labs have any prognostic value beyond that provided by routine admission labs and vitals, and costs of labs with no prognostic value.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed adult patients admitted with COVID-19 from 3/2020 to 7/2020. Outcomes were mortality, ICU stay, and length of hospitalization. Multivariable logistic and linear regression were used to determine if COVID-19-specific admission labs have any prognostic value beyond that provided by vitals and routine admission labs. COVID-19-specific labs were d-Dimer, fibrinogen, ferritin, LDH, CK, pro-BNP, troponin, and CRP. Multivariable models included all routine admission labs and vitals. COVID-19-specific admission labs were included in the multivariable models if the p-value was <0.05 in the univariable analysis.Results: 331 patients met study criteria, inpatient mortality was 13.0%, 52.4% of patients required ICU stays and the average length of hospitalization was 8.9 days. COVID-19-specific labs showed no additional prognostic value for mortality. CRP, LDH, and d-Dimer provided additional prognostic information for ICU stay. CRP≥100 mg/dL and LDH≥900 U/L were associated with increased length of hospitalization.Conclusion: Only 3 of 8 admission COVID-19-specific labs recommended by our institution's protocol had additional prognostic value beyond that provided by routine labs and vitals. The total cost of non-prognostic COVID-19-specific labs during the study period was $75,874.

Patients' attitudes towards cost feedback to doctors to prevent unnecessary testing: a qualitative focus group study.

OBJECTIVES: There is a need to improve efficiency in healthcare delivery without compromising quality of care. One approach is the development and evaluation of behavioural strategies to reduce unnecessary use of common tests. However, there is an absence of evidence on patient attitudes to the use of such approaches in the delivery of care. Our objective was to explore patient acceptability of a nudge-type intervention that aimed to modify blood test requests by hospital doctors. STUDY DESIGN: Single-centre qualitative study. METHODS: The financial costs of common blood tests were presented to hospital doctors on results reports for 1 year at a hospital. Focus group discussions were conducted with recent inpatients at the hospital using a semi-structured question schedule. Discussions were transcribed and analysed using qualitative content analysis to identify and prioritise common themes explaining attitudes to the intervention approach. RESULTS: Three focus groups involving 17 participants were conducted. Patients were generally apprehensive about the provision of blood test cost feedback to doctors. Attitudes were organised around themes representing beliefs about blood tests, the impact on doctors and their autonomy, and beliefs about unnecessary testing. Patients thought that blood tests were important, powerful and inexpensive, and cost information could place doctors under additional pressure. CONCLUSION: The findings identify predominantly positive beliefs about testing and negative attitudes to the use of financial costs in the decision-making of hospital doctors. Public discussion and education about the possible overuse of common tests may allow more resources to be allocated to evidence-based healthcare, by reducing the perception that such strategies to improve healthcare efficiency negatively impact on quality of care.

Optimization of the thyroid panel for diagnostic purposes: Thyrotropin cut-off values for the reflex addition of free thyroxine.

BACKGROUND-AIM: Measurement of serum thyrotropin is currently the recommended test for the screening of thyroid dysfunction, while serum free thyroxine is kept as a reflex test. In our laboratory, the strategy followed in adult individuals from Primary Care includes a 'safety margin' for requests with a thyrotropin ≤1.0 or ≥4.0 mIU/L (normal: 0.35-4.95 mIU/L). Our aim was to optimize the thyrotropin cut-off values for the addition of free thyroxine and, based on these cut-offs, to retrospectively analyze avoidable free thyroxine measurements and possible adverse clinical consequences. METHODS: Retrospective observational study performed in a tertiary care hospital between 2013 and 2018. We considered all laboratory requests for screening of thyroid dysfunction (TD) in adult patients from Primary Care. Requests from patients with a previous diagnosis of thyroid disease or pregnant women were excluded. Different receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed and the obtained thyrotropin cut-off values were compared. Economic savings were assessed considering the current cost of free thyroxin assays in our laboratory. RESULTS: From a total of 554,529 TD protocols included, 119,504 requests had free thyroxine added. From the ROC curve that enables ≥95% of abnormal free thyroxine results to be detected, the thyrotropin values obtained were ≥4.58 mIU/L and ≤0.94 mIU/L. These thyrotropin cut-off values would lead to a saving of 22.7% of annual free thyroxine measurements without adverse clinical consequences. DISCUSSION: Setting optimized thyrotropin cutoffs for reflex testing of free thyroxine would reduce the need for this test. Clinical laboratories need to offer not only true results, but also become the cornerstone in the optimization of resources.

Evaluation of complete blood cell and inflammatory parameters in patients with alopecia areata: Their association with disease severity.

BACKGROUND: Alopecia areata (AA) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by non-cicatricial hair loss. The cause of the disease is still unknown. It can appear at any age and occurs in 0.2% of the general population. Red cell distribution width (RDW), mean platelet volume (MPV), plateletcrit (PCT), the ratio of neutrophils to lymphocytes (NLR), and the ratio of platelets to lymphocytes (PLR) have all been reported as inflammatory markers in recent studies. However, these parameters have not been investigated in AA patients. AIM: We investigated the haematological and inflammatory parameters of AA and considered their association with disease severity. PATIENTS/METHODS: One hundred and five patients with AA and 108 healthy controls were enrolled in the study. RDW, MPV, PCT, NLR, PLR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were studied retrospectively. Disease severity was evaluated by using the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between RDW, MPV, PCT, NLR, and PLR levels in AA patients and in healthy controls. Only the CRP values were significantly higher in the AA group. CONCLUSION: Complete blood count (CBC) parameters are low-cost tests that can be used to define inflammation levels in inflammatory diseases. Our study shows that CRP can be used as a marker in diagnosing AA.

Rheumatoid factor testing in Spanish primary care: A population-based cohort study including 4.8 million subjects and almost half a million measurements / Uso del factor reumatoide en atención primaria en España: estudio de cohortes poblacionales incluyendo 4.8 millones de participantes y casi medio millón de mediciones

OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid factor (RF) testing is used in primary care in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA); however a positive RF may occur without RA. Incorrect use of RF testing may lead to increased costs and delayed diagnoses. The aim was to assess the performance of RF as a test for RA and to estimate the costs associated with its use in a primary care setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using the Information System for the Development of Research in Primary Care database (contains primary care records and laboratory results of >80% of the Catalonian population, Spain). Participants were patients ≥18 years with ≥1 RF test performed between 01/01/2006 and 31/12/2011, without a pre-existing diagnosis of RA. Outcome measures were an incident diagnosis of RA within 1 year of testing, and the cost of testing per case of RA. RESULTS: 495,434/4,796,498 (10.3%) patients were tested at least once.107,362 (21.7%) of those tested were sero-positive of which 2768 (2.6%) were diagnosed with RA within 1 year as were 1141/388,072 (0.3%) sero-negative participants. The sensitivity of RF was 70.8% (95% CI 69.4-72.2), specificity 78.7% (78.6-78.8), and positive and negative predictive values 2.6% (2.5-2.7) and 99.7% (99.6-99.7) respectively. Approximately €3,963,472 was spent, with a cost of €1432 per true positive case. CONCLUSIONS: Although 10% of patients were tested for RF, most did not have RA. Limiting testing to patients with a higher pre-test probability would significantly reduce the cost of testing

OBJETIVOS: El factor reumatoide (FR) se usa en atención primaria para el diagnóstico de la artritis reumatoide (AR); sin embargo, un FR positivo puede observarse en sujetos sin AR, y su uso inapropiado puede conllevar costes y retraso diagnóstico. En este contexto, estudiamos la utilidad y costes del FR como test diagnóstico de la AR en atención primaria. MÉTODOS: Estudio de cohortes retrospectivas basadas en datos de historia clínica informatizada de >80% de la población de Cataluña (SIDIAP). Se incluyeron sujetos de edad ≥18 años y con ≥1 medida de FR entre el 1/1/2006 y el 31/12/2011, sin diagnóstico previo de AR. El diagnóstico incidente de AR durante el año posterior a la medida de FR, y el coste por caso de AR fueron las medidas de interés. RESULTADOS: 495.434/4.796.498 (10,3%) pacientes tuvieron al menos una medida de FR 107.362 (21,7%) de estos fueron sero-positivos, de los cuales solo 2.768 (2,6%) fueron diagnosticados de AR en el año siguiente, comparado a 1.141/388.072 (0,3%) diagnósticos en sero-negativos. La sensibilidad del FR fue del 70,8% (IC 95%: 69,4 a 72,2%), especificidad 78,7% (78,6 a 78,8%), y valor predictivo positivo y negativo 2,6% (2,5 a 2,7%) y 99,7% (99,6 a 99,7%), respectivamente. El coste total estimado fue de 3.963,472€, alrededor de 1.432€ por caso de AR diagnosticado. CONCLUSIONES: Aunque el 10% de participantes (casi medio millón de personas) fueron sujetos de medición/es de FR, la mayoría no desarrollaron AR. El uso de FR en pacientes con mayor probabilidad pre-test reduciría de forma significativa su coste

Utility of Perioperative Laboratory Tests in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Spinal Fusion for Scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to characterize the frequency of perioperative laboratory tests for posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and to assess whether test results affected clinical management. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Perioperative laboratory tests for PSF including complete blood count, coagulation laboratory tests, basic metabolic panels (BMPs), and type and screen, are commonly ordered based on providers' discretion or existing order sets. Studies have shown unnecessary laboratory tests as financially and physically costly in adults; however, no studies have examined the necessity of common perioperative laboratory tests in pediatric spinal deformity surgery. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients aged 10-18 years who underwent PSF for AIS at our center in the past three years. The clinical utility of perioperative laboratory tests was assessed based on detected incidence of anemia, blood transfusions, hematology/endocrinology/nephrology consultations, insulin administration, and postponed/canceled surgeries. RESULTS: A total of 234 patients were included (mean age 14.4 ± 1.8 years, 75% female). Of 105 (44.9%) patients with preoperative coagulation laboratory tests, 21 (20%) had abnormal results; however, none had subsequent hematology consultations or canceled/postponed surgeries. Postoperatively, only 5 (2.1%) patients and 30 (12.8%) patients had hemoglobin values less than 8 g/dL on postoperative day (POD) 1 and 2, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified POD1 hemoglobin ≤9.35 g/dL as the only predictor of hemoglobin <8 g/dL on POD2. Overall, there were 8 (3.4%) indicated blood transfusions postoperatively. Costs of unnecessary laboratory tests averaged $95.27 (range $49.72 to $240.27) per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Many perioperative laboratory orders may be unnecessary in pediatric spinal deformity surgery, subjecting patients to extraneous costs and needlesticks. In particular, preoperative coagulation laboratory tests, perioperative BMPs, and additional postoperative CBCs for those with hemoglobin >9.35 on POD1 may not be warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

ATBdiscrimination: An in Silico Tool for Identification of Active Tuberculosis Disease Based on Routine Blood Test and T-SPOT.TB Detection Results.

Tuberculosis remains one of the deadliest infectious diseases worldwide. Only 5-15% of people infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis develop active TB disease (ATB), while others remain latently infected (LTBI) during their lifetime, which has a completely different clinical treatment schedule. However, most current clinical diagnostic methods are based on the immune response of M. tuberculosis infections and cannot distinguish ATB from LTBIs. Thus, the rapid diagnosis of active or latent tuberculosis infections remains a serious challenge for clinicians. In this work, based on the test data of a total of 478 patients, 36 blood biochemical data were specially included with T-SPOT.TB detection results which are all from routine clinical practice as commercially available. Then a discrimination method to detect ATB infections was successfully developed based on these data by the random forest algorithm. This method presents a robust classification performance with AUC as 0.9256 and 0.8731 for the cross-validation set and the external validation set, respectively. This work suggests an innovative strategy for identification of ATB disease from a single drop of blood with advantages of being timely, efficient, and economical. It also provides valuable information for the comprehensive understanding of TB with deep associations between TB infection and routine blood test data. The web server of this identification method, called ATBdiscrimination, is now available online at http://lishuyan.lzu.edu.cn/ATB/ATBdiscrimination.html .

Health economic implications of testing blood donors in South Africa for HTLV 1 & 2 infection.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Currently, HTLV screening is not performed in South Africa (SA). This report describes an economic assessment (budget impact and cost-effectiveness) of implementing different HTLV screening strategies. METHODS: A modified version of the Alliance of Blood Operators risk-based decision-making framework was used to assess the risk and consequences of HTLV in the blood supply in SA. We developed a deterministic model of the cost and consequences of four screening strategies: none, universal, all donors once and first time donors only assuming a transfusion-transmission (TT) efficiency of 10% and a manifestation of clinical disease of 6%. RESULTS: Unscreened blood results in 3·55 symptomatic TT-HTLV cases and a total healthcare cost of Rand (R)3 446 950 (US Dollars (USD)229 800) annually. Universal screening would cost R24 000 000 (USD1 600 000) per annum and prevent 3·54 (99·8%) symptomatic TT-HTLV cases in the first year and 0·55 (98·4%) symptomatic TT-HTLV cases in the second year at a cost per TT-HTLV prevented of R6 780 000 (USD450 000) in year one and R43 254 000 (USD2 890 000) in year two. Screening all donors once would cost R16,200,000 (USD1 080 000) or R4 600 000 (USD306 000) per symptomatic TT-HTLV infection prevented in year one. Total costs decrease to R5 100 000 (USD340 000) in year 2 but the cost per TT-HTLV prevented increases to R10 700 000 (USD713 333). CONCLUSION: This analysis contributed to the decision not to implement HTLV screening as the healthcare budget and particularly the budget for blood transfusion in SA is insufficient to provide appropriate treatment. Arguably, available resources can be more efficiently utilized in other healthcare programs.

The Utility and Cost Effectiveness of Immediate Postoperative Laboratory Studies in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Routine immediate postoperative laboratory studies, including metabolic panels and hematologic profiles, are commonly ordered after arthroplasty procedures. However, their values only occasionally influence management. This study investigated the clinical utility and value of these tests. METHODS: A large retrospective cohort study of 18,935 patients spanning a 6-year period from 2008 to 2013 from a single high-volume institution was evaluated. Only immediate postoperative labs drawn on postoperative day 0 in the recovery room were included in the study. Complete blood counts (CBC) and basic metabolic panels (BMP) were reviewed, and ranges of abnormal were set for each lab test based on values significant enough to impact patient management. Cost effectiveness calculations were made based on current cost of the laboratory tests. RESULTS: Actionably low hemoglobin values ( < 8 g/dL) were found in 1.44% of the overall cohort. Unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty was associated with the fewest hemoglobin abnormalities at 0.59%. Primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty was associated with abnormal hemoglobin values in 1.81% of cases. Significant electrolyte abnormalities were far less common, with hyperkalemia (> 6.5 mEq/L) in 0.19%, hyponatremia ( < 120 mEq/L) in 0.01% and elevated creatinine (> 2.0 mg/dL) was found in 0.25%. Hemoglobin values were calculated at a cost of $1,710 to detect a single significantly abnormal result. The cost to detect a single actionably abnormal BMP value was $1,000. CONCLUSIONS: Routine immediate postoperative laboratory tests represent a high institutional cost and are seldom abnormal enough to warrant a change in patient management. The routine use of these tests can likely be safely eliminated in uncomplicated primary unilateral arthroplasty procedures.

The impact of the introduction of a point-of-care haematology analyser in a New Zealand rural hospital with no onsite laboratory.

INTRODUCTION: Hokianga Hospital is a small rural hospital in the far north of New Zealand serving a predominantly Maori population of 6500. The hospital, an integral part of a comprehensive primary healthcare service, provides continuous acute in-hospital and emergency care. Point-of-care (POC) biochemistry has been available at the hospital since 2010 but there is no onsite laboratory. This study looked at the impact of introducing a POC haematology benchtop analyser at Hokianga Hospital. METHODS: This was a mixed methods study conducted at Hokianga Hospital over 4 months in 2016. Quantitative and qualitative components and a cost-benefit analysis were combined using an integrative process. Part I: Doctors working at Hokianga Hospital completed a form before and after POC haematology testing, recording test indication, differential diagnosis, planned patient disposition and impact on patient treatment. Part II: Focus group interviews were conducted with Hokianga Hospital doctors, nurses and a cultural advisor. Part III: An analysis of cost versus tangible benefits was conducted. RESULTS: Part I: A total of 97 POC haematology tests were included in the study. Of these, 97% were undertaken in the setting of the acute clinical presentation and 72% were performed out of hours. The average number of differential diagnoses reduced from 2.43 pre-test to 1.7 post-test, (χ2 tests p<0.05). There was a significant reduction in the number of patients transferred and an increase in the number of patients discharged home (χ2 tests p<0.05). Part II: Three main themes were identified: impact on patient management, challenges and the commitment to 'make it work'. POC haematology had a positive impact on patient management and clinician confidence mainly by increasing diagnostic certainty. The main challenges related to the hidden costs of implementing the analyser and its associated quality assurance program in a remote-from-laboratory setting. Part III: Tangible cost-benefit analysis showed a clear cost saving to the health system as a whole. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first published study evaluating the impact of haematology POC testing on acute clinical care in a rural hospital with no onsite laboratory. Timely access to a full blood count POC improves clinical care and addresses inequity. There was an overall reduction in healthcare costs. The study highlighted the hidden costs of implementing POC systems and their associated quality assurance programs in a remote-from-laboratory context.

Applicability of papain solutions in immunohematology.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the enzyme activity of different presentations of papain solution to validate in-house preparations. METHODS: Two papain solutions were prepared, and the third presentation was a commercial solution. Tests were carried out with samples of red cells typed as weak RhD. RESULTS: In-house prepared papain solutions showed similar enzyme reactivity, and statistically no differences compared to the enzyme activity of the commercial solution. CONCLUSION: Evaluating the cost-benefit ratio, the in-house prepared papain solutions present more economic advantages, and can be incorporated into immunohematological routines as a way to cope with periods of financial crisis and cost-containment policies.